Machine Safety Audit – ISO 12100, Directive 2006/42/EC, and Regulation (EU) 2023/1230

A machine safety audit is a structured, end-to-end evaluation of industrial equipment and production lines that identifies hazards, checks compliance with applicable laws and standards, and translates findings into practical improvements. Built on the PN-EN ISO 12100:2012 methodology, this process helps organisations ensure that machines meet essential health and safety requirements (EHSR) and operate safely under real production conditions. While Directive 2006/42/EC (the Machinery Directive) currently governs CE marking, the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 has entered into force and becomes fully applicable on 20 January 2027. This audit approach is designed to remain valid across both frameworks.

What a Machine Safety Audit Covers

At its core, a machine safety audit verifies two things: that people can work safely with the machine, and that the machine complies with applicable regulations and harmonised standards, which provide a presumption of conformity with the relevant EHSR. The audit addresses equipment across its operational lifecycle – from installation and normal operation to cleaning, adjustment, and maintenance. Its output is more than a list of issues: it is a prioritised plan showing how to eliminate hazards at the source or reduce risks to acceptable levels, while maintaining throughput and quality.

For manufacturers introducing new equipment, machine builders seeking independent verification, or design offices wanting an external assessment of their designs, a safety audit serves as a reality check. It examines whether declared compliance translates into day-to-day practice and whether documentation is complete, consistent, and aligned with CE marking obligations.

Methodology: Documentation Review and On-Site Assessment

An audit begins with a documentation review. Auditors examine the technical file (Machinery Directive: Annex VII; Machinery Regulation: Annex IV), schematics, user and maintenance manuals, existing risk assessments, and any prior conformity documents (e.g., EU Declaration of Conformity – MD: Annex II; MR: Annex V). This preparation clarifies intended use, reasonably foreseeable misuse, and any constraints that must be respected.

The next stage is an on-site assessment focused on the production process. By observing how operators interact with controls, how materials move between stations, and how access is managed for cleaning or changeovers, auditors often spot hazards that written documentation might miss. Common examples include bypassed guards, improvised tools, or behaviours that emerge under time pressure. By grounding recommendations in observed conditions, the audit avoids theoretical fixes and suggests changes that fit the line’s workflow.

Risk Evaluation and Risk Reduction Under ISO 12100

Once hazards are identified, the auditor evaluates each risk based on the severity of harm and the probability of occurrence. PN-EN ISO 12100:2012 provides the framework for this analysis, defining a hierarchy of risk-reduction measures:

• Inherently safe design – eliminate the hazard at its source wherever feasible.
• Technical protective measures – use guards, interlocks, light curtains, or safety-related control systems (designed and validated in line with ISO 13849-1/-2 or IEC 62061) to prevent or detect dangerous situations.
• Information for use – provide clear instructions, warnings, training, and procedural controls to complement the engineered safeguards.

Each recommendation is evaluated for feasibility and impact on productivity and maintenance. The aim is to enhance safety without introducing bottlenecks or compromising the machine’s availability. Because CE marking of machinery requires a comprehensive risk assessment, an ISO 12100-aligned audit helps maintain traceability from hazard identification to the implementation and verification of measures.

Substantial Modification Under Regulation (EU) 2023/1230

The audit also examines the legal implications of planned modifications. If a change introduces new hazards or increases existing ones to a level requiring additional protective measures, it may qualify as a substantial modification under the Machinery Regulation. In such cases, the entity making the change effectively assumes the manufacturer’s responsibilities. Before the modified machine returns to operation, the organisation may need to perform a new conformity assessment (with renewed CE marking if applicable), backed by an updated technical file and a new EU Declaration of Conformity. Where appropriate, the assessment may be limited to the modified part provided overall compliance is ensured. By flagging such scenarios early, the audit helps plan modernisation projects so that compliance activities run in parallel with engineering work, minimising disruption.

Business Benefits: Safety, Continuity, and Culture

The business case for a machine safety audit is straightforward. Improving machine safety reduces the likelihood of accidents, unplanned downtime, and regulatory penalties. In practice, many safety improvements also streamline operations: better guarding and dependable interlocks lead to more stable cycles, fewer stoppages, and clearer responsibilities for both operators and maintenance teams. An independent audit report demonstrates due diligence to stakeholders and authorities, and implementing these recommendations raises awareness across the workforce. Over time, these efforts foster a mature safety culture that supports continuous improvement and helps ensure the organisation remains compliant with CE marking obligations.

From Findings to Implementation

An audit only delivers value when its findings are put into action. High-quality audit services provide practical support after the report is delivered. Typical follow-up support includes:

• Documentation updates – updating instructions, safety schematics, and risk assessments so that documentation reflects the machine’s current state and meets CE-marking requirements (technical file per MD Annex VII / MR Annex IV; EU Declaration per MD Annex II / MR Annex V).

• Engineering of protective measures – specifying and integrating guards, fenced zones, interlocks, or safety-related control systems (per ISO 13849 or IEC 62061) while respecting the line’s ergonomics and pace.

• Modernisation project management – co-ordinating design, installation, verification, and handover to keep projects on schedule while maintaining quality.

• Verification after changes – confirming that hazards have been eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level and, where required, guiding the organisation through a new conformity assessment (with renewed CE marking if needed) before the machine returns to service.

Conclusion

A machine safety audit grounded in ISO 12100 and executed in real operating conditions is one of the most effective ways to protect people and sustain performance. By combining disciplined risk assessment with practical on-site insight, it pinpoints the issues that matter, prioritises corrective actions, and clarifies when modernisation triggers additional obligations. With structured support for documentation, engineering changes, and legal conformity steps, organisations can prevent incidents, minimise downtime, and stay compliant with CE marking requirements throughout the equipment lifecycle.

Learn more at: eshield.pl/en/